Home

Should we change svn repo to git?

Submitted by Farcaller on 20 October, 2006 - 14:41.
Yes
33% (13 votes)
No
36% (14 votes)
I don't care
31% (12 votes)
Total votes: 39
» 1269 reads

git is better for storing

Submitted by Farcaller on 20 October, 2006 - 14:43.

git is better for storing the kernel, however git.hackndev.com is somewhat slower than svn.sourceforge.net

Anyways, vote, and let's see the results.

To H&D developers: please post a comment after you vote describing why you voted your way.

» login or register to post comments

I don't know... and i'm not

Submitted by orange on 20 October, 2006 - 16:31.

I don't know... and i'm not developer.

» login or register to post comments

I'm not too fussed but voted

Submitted by Alex on 20 October, 2006 - 17:02.

I'm not too fussed but voted yes since then we could use Trac's integration features and all of git's nice ways of doing things. If we do decide to move it to git, it might be worth flattening some of the early history to lower the download size for git-clone. The old history would still be accessible via sf.net though, of course.

» login or register to post comments

Those two who choosed "No",

Submitted by Farcaller on 20 October, 2006 - 17:18.

Those two who choosed "No", please comment here or votes would be removed.

» login or register to post comments

I say "No". I don't like

Submitted by Vasy on 25 October, 2006 - 05:49.

I say "No". I don't like constantly change of tool.

» login or register to post comments